This fall, my AP Physics 2 classes will be using Chromebooks as part of my school district’s 1:1 pilot. Chromebooks were new to me; so, it took some time this summer to find the apps to support the workflow I want for this class. While I’m sure the toolchain will change throughout the semester, and there will be surprises (both pleasant and otherwise), here is the starting toolchain:
* [Canvas](http://www.instructure.com/k-12/). Everything starts and ends with this learning-management system.
We will do a lot of lab activities. The workflow depends on the amount of data acquired and the level of graphical analysis required. The start of the workflow is the same:
* [LabQuest 2](http://www.vernier.com/products/interfaces/labq2/?lq2-home). Vernier’s LabQuest 2 can create its own ad-hoc network or connect to the school’s wireless network. The LabQuest 2 hosts its own web page as part of their [Connected Science System](http://www.vernier.com/products/wireless-solutions/connected-science-system/). Students can then access the device, the data, and graphs via Chrome. Data and graphs can be exported to the Chromebook via the web page.
The next tool depends upon the lab. For some labs, the data and graphs produced on the LabQuest 2 are sufficient. Students will import these into their [Google Document](http://www.google.com/docs/about/) and create whatever is required for their lab report. If additional analysis is required and the data sets are relatively small:
* [Desmos](https://www.desmos.com). A fantastic graphing app. For small data sets and [applying linear fits in a meaningful manner](https://www.desmos.com/calculator/w5a3shbzy4), it is fantastic. Graphs can be shared via a link and an image can be embedded in the Google document.
If data sets are large or more sophisticated analysis is required:
* [Plot.ly](https://plot.ly). Plot.ly seemed to explode onto the education scene this summer, or maybe I was just paying more attention. Data exported from the LabQuest 2 can easily be imported into Plot.ly. Like Desmos, graphs can be shared via a link and an image can be embedded in the Google document. Plot.ly can also embed its graphs in an iframe, but I couldn’t find a way to embed that in a Google document as opposed to a web page. Fran Poodry from Vernier made a great [screencast](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBH2eSQ9DqY) demonstrating the integration of the LabQuest 2 and Ploy.ly.
Regardless of the analysis performed, in the end, students create their lab report in Google docs and submit it via Canvas.
Another important aspect of class is the exploration and modification of computational models. In the past, we’ve used [VPython](http://vpython.org). I had to find an alternative that would be compatible with Chromebooks:
* [Glowscript](http://www.glowscript.org). Glowscript is the up-and-coming platform for computational models with the advantage that it runs in a browser that supports WebGL. I’m not a huge fan of JavaScript syntax for novice programmers; so, we will be using [CoffeeScript](http://coffeescript.org) instead. I didn’t write as many starting models over the summer as I had hoped, but I did at least verify that [complicated models](http://www.glowscript.org/#/user/gcschmit/folder/My_Programs/program/Maxwell-Boltzmann) can be ported.
Peer instruction is one of the most effective and popular classroom activities that we do. In the past, I’ve used handheld clickers. This year, we will use the Chromebooks:
* [InfuseLearning](http://www.infuselearning.com). There are a number of web apps in this space, but I selected InfuseLearing because it allows the creation of spontaneous questions, supports a variety of answer methods including drawing and sort-in-order. [Pear Deck](https://peardeck.com) looks promising, but I don’t want to be forced to create my set of questions ahead of time.
For notes in class, I’ll leave it up to students to use whatever tool works best for them (including paper and pencil). I’ll suggest they at least take a look at:
* [Evernote](https://evernote.com). I love Evernote and use it all the time for all sorts of stuff.
I do provide students with PDFs of my slides. I can envision that students may want to annotate these PDFs or other handouts. Surprisingly, this was the hardest tool to find:
* [Crocodoc](http://personal.crocodoc.com). The free personal version allows students to upload a PDF, annotate it, and export their annotated version. Other tools I explored are [Notable PDF](http://www.notablepdf.com). This requires paid licenses to be useful. We may try this out if we find Crocodoc lacking.
A couple of other tools that looks interesting, but I’m not sure if they fits into the toolchain for my class is:
* [Doctopus](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/doctopus/ffhegaddkjpkfiemhhnphmnadfbkdhbf?hl=en). I think Canvas assignments and SpeedGrader cover everything that I personally would do with this app.
* [81Dash](http://81dash.com). Private back-channeling app.
I’m sure I will learn of new tools throughout the semester and I’ll make adjustments to the toolchain. If you are using Chromebooks, please share your favorite apps below in the comments!
What are the best tools for collecting accurate position & time data using a Chromebook? I have always used LoggerPro to do video analysis, but now I have a classroom set of Chromebooks and a few LabQuest2 devices. Sonic range finders work great for linear motion, but what about 2D motion? Any ideas?
I haven’t found a video analysis replacement for LoggerPro or Tracker that runs on Chromebooks. At this point, I would honestly sign out regular laptops for a video analysis lab….
I’m really curious about how it went for you teaching physics with Chromebooks. I teach IB physics and my school is probably going to switch to Chromebooks as the 1:1 device (instead of laptops running Windows). Do you know of a workable solution for video analysis with Chromebooks? And is there anything really cool that should make me excited about teaching physics with Chromebooks?
I didn’t teach physics this year, but I’m not aware of any developments in terms of video analysis on Chromebook.
There are a couple of benefits of 1:1 Chromebook that I personally found. One, is makes Peer Instruction via The Answer Pad, Socrative, or PearDeck really easy since every student has a computer and can be ready to answer questions in seconds. Two, with Vernier’s LabQuest 2 interfaces, every student in the lab group gets the data on their own Chromebook and can perform the analysis as opposed to having the data on only one laptop for the group.
It’s really sad that there is no video analysis software that runs consistently on Chromebooks.